Talk:Yi Kang

Title
While I think Yi Seok is doing a lot to improve awareness and preserve history of the royal family, something that is sorely needed, he and his supporters sometimes overreach in attempting to demonstrate that he should head of household. Euihwa was never the crown prince, and the article should not be headed to give that impression. --Dan 20:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Repeat - could someone more knowledgable than I about wiki article moving please change the title of the article, since Euihwa never was crown prince? --Dan 21:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * This leads us to the question of what the title should be... I see where Naming conventions (names and titles) now specifically disclaims any authority over Eastern nobility; on the other hand, Naming conventions (Korean) doesn't have anything to say about Korean Empire titles ... Suggestions are welcome, but for now I'll try Prince Imperial Ui, per the first line of the article. -- Visviva 08:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Visviva - that makes sense to me, since it was his highest actual title. --Dan 16:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Flimsy rationale not related to WP:AT (as is urged in many places). No support and no consensus, and already relisted once in the hope of getting it. We move on. Please also note that these three moves could and should have been raised and discussed as one multi move. Andrewa (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yi Kang → Prince Uihwa – Royal name instead of personal name. --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:30, 20 April 2014 (UTC)  Article editor (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose, per WP:COMMONNAME. The title should tell the reader how the subject is normally referred to. There is no reason to prefer a name on the basis of being royal. One leg at a time (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

good job
This article is refreshingly well-written, when compared to many similar articles about people from this time period. toobigtokale (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)