Talk:Yook O'Clock

Requested move 23 February 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Yook O'clock → Yook O'Clock – I started a discussion at the Guild of Copy Editors about this (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors), and consensus seems to be tending towards capitalising both the "O" and the "C" of "O'Clock". There does seem to be universal agreement that "O'clock" is not correct, however, despite the fact that the stylisation by the artist and his record company is "YOOK O'clock"... we wouldn't base the title of the article on any stylisation. The standard procedure on Wikipedia for titles of works appears to be to capitalise both the "O" and the "C" – The Five O'Clock Girl, Not the Nine O'Clock News, Eight O'Clock Walk, etc. and this should be followed here. Richard3120 (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Support: Support, with "Yook O'Clock" (stylized as "YOOK O'clock") in lead sentence. We don't follow the stylization of sources, and there are a wealth of examples for O'Clock at Special:Search/intitle:o'clock. Please ensure that there are redirects at likely alternative capitalizations. – Reidgreg (talk) 14:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per nom, Reidgreg, MOS:TITLECAPS and MOS:MUSICCAPS.  Mini  apolis  16:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. Captainllama (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.