Talk:You're My Heart, You're My Soul

Merging/Separation of song articles
Please note : There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separate different versions of the same song. Please make known your feelings on the matter. Regards --Richhoncho (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Genres after 1998 reunion
We've had the same anonymous IP (starting with 201.) inserting New Wave genre for Modern Talking's 1998 version of "You're My Heart, You're My Soul 1998". Please note that New Wave genre has no longer been used by any dance act in Germany after early 1990s. Consequently, Modern Talking came back in 1998 basing most of their tracks on then-German-music-market's demand, which was at the time Eurodance, including "You're My Heart, You're My Soul 1998". Some of Modern Talking tracks after their reunion can be viewed as Trance also, including tracks like "Anything is Possible" (from Back for Good), or "Time is on My Side" (From Year of the Dragon), so Trance genre could be included in the infobox. But not New Wave which was popular genre in '80s.--Harout72 (talk) 03:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You're my heart you're my soul '98 : changing Electronic/Dance in Eurodance ?
As I tried to show through references, You're my heart you're my soul '98 is in fact much more Eurodance-oriented than the original version.

Electronic music and Dance music are not very precise genres here, because Modern Taking made a lot of electronic, dance-oriented songs (at first in New wave, Synthpop and Europop genres, and from 1998-2003 in a more Eurodance-oriented genre). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.12.250.93 (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There are two problems with your edit. 1) Both sources that you used here, and here are not reliable, they are wikipedia mirrors, meaning that the entire content within sources are copied from Modern Talking by the persons who've created those sites. 2) You don't write a mini story in the template of the sources as you have done here.--Harout72 (talk) 22:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)