Talk:You're Not Sorry/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ..:CK:..  ( talk 2 me ) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Starting the review. ..:CK:.. ( talk 2 me ) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "It enjoyed positive commercial outcomes in North America" should be rewritten. Doesn't quite flow. I would use "Achieved".
 * "In the United States, "You're Not Sorry" also at number eleven on the Billboard Hot 100 and[...]" Needs to be rewritten.
 * Link number 7 should not be linked to a url, see 4 Minutes to see how it should be linked.
 * In the article it says the song has been certified Gold, it needs a certification section and a proper link.. this is the link needed : link The one currently used doesn't link to the actual certification.
 * If possible, there should be a "Personal Section". Never mind, not all GA's contain this.
 * "Swift wrote "You're Not Sorry", inspired by an ex-boyfriend who was revealed to be who she thought he was." Needs to be rewritten, doesnt flow or sound correct.
 * "She wrote "You're Not Sorry" an an emotional state,[...]" double an, i think you meant "in an emotional state[...]"
 * "The circumstances faced a point[...]" I think you mean... "The circumstances reached a point[...]"
 * Under chart performance, there are two back to back sentences starting with "The song was[...]" (last and second last sentences to be specific). I would reword the last sentence to say : In Canada, the song debuted and peaked at number eleven on the Canadian Hot 100. Something like that, just so they dont start with the same opening statement.
 * The main image is 300x302. Images should not be any bigger then 300x300. Its needs a new upload.
 * "You're Not Sorry" spent a total of five weeks on the Billboard Hot 100. "You're Not Sorry" also peaked at number twenty-one the now-defunct Pop 100 Chart". Back to back opening again.

Please correct these, i will add more(if found) and begin the prose review once these issues are addressed. ..:CK:.. ( talk 2 me ) 23:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Prose Review:


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I believe this article passes :) Nice work. ..:CK:..  ( talk 2 me ) 07:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I believe this article passes :) Nice work. ..:CK:..  ( talk 2 me ) 07:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I believe this article passes :) Nice work. ..:CK:..  ( talk 2 me ) 07:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)