Talk:You're Not the One/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 22:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm more than happy to return the favor and review this GAN, my full review will be here shortly! WikiRedactor (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Toolbox
 * Three disambiguation links to correct


 * Infobox and Introduction
 * I would suggest removing the small text for "Los Angeles, California" (I've been trying to limit my use of it lately!)

✅ ✅
 * I also recommend California, because the link for Los Angeles is enough and I don't think the state is needed in this case.
 * Please replace the semi-colon with a comma in the final sentence of the second paragraph.

✅ ✅ ✅
 * Background
 * "at a time where—according to her—Ferreira" should read "at a time where—according to Ferreira—she".
 * Can you replace basically with something a little more formal like "essentially", "largely", etc.?
 * Composition
 * "Nourish" sounds more like food to me, maybe "express" would be better here?
 * Can you insert a

template to keep the section from bumping into the heading for the next section? ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ but slightly different; I had already used 'announced' in that sentence. ✅ ✅
 * Critical reception
 * I would start the paragraph with a brief mention that the reviews were generally favorable.
 * For the AllMusic review, you should restate that the album you are referring to is Night Time, My Time.
 * I would specifically mention the author of the Time reference for the year-end mention.
 * Music video
 * Instead of "advanced", I think "announced" would be a better word to use.
 * Live performances
 * When talking about the Bangerz Tour, you can just say "American" instead of "the United States".
 * Credits and personnel
 * Night Time, My Time should be italicized.

✅ ✅
 * Spot-checking
 * Reference 28 (Idolator) needs the link in the citation.
 * Reference 29 (New York Local) needs the link in the citation.
 * The article is in good shape, and after these comments are addressed, I will be happy to pass the article. WikiRedactor (talk) 16:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I think everything's fine now! :)  prism  △ 17:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Passing, good work! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Check now! :) (I had accidentally reverted the article's new version.  prism  △ 15:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Non-reviewer comment
 * Article definitely needs to contain reviews of the song. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought something was wrong :P. Otherwise, I would've said it needs massive expansion. Good luck in the review! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)