Talk:YouGov/Archives/2015

biased
Contains only examples where they predicted correctly. --94.221.83.98 (talk) 07:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Very much agreed, the section which starts "YouGov is known for its accurate predictions relating to popular culture" particularly seems like it is written by a YouGov employee.

Agreed. How about splitting the accuracy section into two subsections - one for notable accurate predictions, and one for notable inaccurate predictions? EdwardRussell (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Much of the article reads like a corporate communications promotional piece. The article should be thoroughly revised to read more neutrally and to incorporate substantive critiques by professional pollsters to achieve balance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.213.228.62 (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)