Talk:You Are in Love/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Hey, @Brachy08! I will be reviewing this article in a few days. What worries me about this process is the shortness of the article, but I will try to save it, I think it is worth it. Best, Santi (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing this article  Brachy 08  (Talk) 00:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Background and writing

 * Can you put an additional source to verify the Red 's release date?
 * Replace parameter "p" with "pp" in ref 2, 'cause it doesn't work.
 * It's page 78, not 77. See Clean (song), which has the same info.
 * For "after her birth year", use this. Refs 5 and 6 don't mention that.
 * Verify that at that time she was on the Red Tour. I know you put it the way it is out of logic, but maybe don't do that.
 * Ref 7 needs to be archieved.
 * Link American Songwriter in ref 9. Furthermore, change template to "cite magazine" and archive it.
 * Authorship and archiving missing in ref 8.

Lyrics and composition

 * Authorship for ref 13, 15, 16 and 18.
 * Archiving for ref 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18.
 * Change template to "cite magazine" for ref 11, 13, 15 and 18.
 * Change template to "cite news" to ref 12.
 * Delete authorship for ref 11 and change "Clash Magazine Music News, Reviews & Interviews" to " Clash "
 * Just leave "David Greenwald" in authorship, delete the rest. Replace "oregonlive" to " The Oregonian
 * Link the websites/magazines/news in all the sources.
 * Fuse ref 15 and 17, they are the same.
 * "Swift also said that she wrote it as a commentary of Swift and Dunham's relationship." Wasn't it Antonoff?.
 * ✅ (by the reviewer)
 * "Swift says she finds it difficult and boring at times. The song also describes love and something that can be felt, seen or heard." I don't understand it.
 * "When interviewed about writing "You Are in Love", Swift said she found it difficult and boring at times." Is that "it" the relationship or the songwriting? According to ref 15, that's the first.
 * "The song also describes love and something that can be felt, seen or heard." I'll assume it's inspired by this part of ref 15: The song’s brief verses documenting everyday life (“Morning, his place / Burnt toast, Sunday”) remind listeners that love doesn’t have to be a grand, sweeping fairytale to be special. If so, I think it would be better to say => "The song also describes that love does not have to be something perfect."

Release and commercial performance

 * It would be better if "iTunes" was always with a lowercase i. I say this because this is not fulfilled in ref 18.
 * Could you tell me the exact quote where it can be confirmed that Swift played it on a steel guitar? I assume it's in the Washington Post article, but I can't access it.
 * Authorship and archiving for the sources that need it.

Critical reception

 * Archiving totally missing.

Credits and personnel

 * It would be better to source the credits, as happens in "Clean".

Charts

 * Passed.

Certification

 * Passed.

Comments

 * Hey, @Brachy0008! I'm close to resuming the review. Before I can begin, I would like to know if the research paper is complete, to make the review a little easier due to the recent AfD nomination. Thank you. Santi (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * What research paper? tho i managed to add content from a book source  Brachy 08  (Talk) 03:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't know. Heartfox said in the AfD that some sources are missing. It is only to know if such sources have already been obtained. Santi (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * we've got one source in. not sure about the others though.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 04:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok. These sources (this and this) maybe can be useful. Just maybe. Found with a cursory Google research, and I couldn't find more sources. So I would assume yes. Santi (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, I believe the article now has sufficient content. How does it look? Ippantekina (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ippantekina: I think so too. More minimal sources are already present that fully address the song. I once and for all apologize to you and @Brachy0008 for the delay. This month has not been so easy due to work (and somewhat personal) reasons, but I will get the article out as soon as possible. Thank you for being aware. Santi (talk) 19:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * until the present errors are fixed. Congrats, @Brachy0008! We are already approaching the end. Santi (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * yay! (even tho i couldn’t be here all the way for the review process)  Brachy 08  (Talk) 01:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Brachy0008: No probs about that! The credits are now verified, but you still haven't explained to me where you got the information about the steel guitar. I will archive and add authorship on my own to the mentioned refs, to let this nomination passed once and for all. Santi (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * i got the steel guitar info from The 1989 World Tour  Brachy 08  (Talk) 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Brachy0008: I'm talking about the source, not anywhere, for reasons explained above. Santi (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * nvm can’t find anything  Brachy 08  (Talk) 00:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * removed the steel guitar thing  Brachy 08  (Talk) 00:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Congrats and thank you for the patience and work. Santi (talk) 00:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)