Talk:You Can't Win (book)

Fair use rationale for Image:YouCan'tWin.jpg
Image:YouCan'tWin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

PD copies on web?
The author apparently died in 1932, which would make this book public domain by now. Is there a linkable copy up anywhere? (I have a PDF, but that's less than an ideal format for all sorts of reasons.) - David Gerard (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Anything published after 1922 is potentially copyright, in the USA. For 1926 it would need to be renewed after X years (30 years?). A quick check of the Stanford Database shows no renewal record. Jack Black died before it came up for renewal, so it may have slipped into the PD, but who knows who owned the Copyright to the book (it was supposedly a best-seller so someone should have been paying attention). Based on the Stanford renewal data it's a good bet that it's PD. --  Green  C  05:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Cover art
The current cover art is from a recent reprint and is Copyright (Fair Use). Since it's likely the book is no longer Copyright (see above) we should be using the cover from an original edition, which is free (PD). Because of this, Fair Use wouldn't apply to the current image since a free version is available. -- Green  C  05:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Can we actually find an original cover in practice not just hypothetically, though? - David Gerard (talk) 23:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, so I found one immediately. Uploading now - David Gerard (talk) 23:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 11:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)