Talk:You Don't Know What to Do/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 01:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

As you can see, I've split the review up into sections that mirror that of the article for ease. Any green text is something being quoted from the article.  Azealia 911  talk  14:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Lead

 * Unlink rapper

Infobox

 * The cover art needs an alt
 * Link Radio airplay

Background and release

 * The alt for the Wale picture needs changing, describing someones fashion in non-fashion related articles is discouraged.
 * Do the liner notes specify that Wale wrote solely his rap verses and nothing more?
 * No, it doesn't. I'm assuming that he only wrote his verse, because Nicki Minaj only writes hers on featured articles. — Calvin999  17:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Wale is not Nicki Minaj.  Azealia 911  talk
 * I know. I removed it. — Calvin999  18:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Artwork controversy

 * an abbreviation of the song's title is incorrect and unsourced.

Composition and lyrics

 * Is woo a part of a quote? It sounds unencyclopedic on its own.
 * No it's not. — Calvin999  17:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Try and switch up the flow in the latter part, I'm seeing three concurrent uses of "*writer* of *publication* ..."

Critical reception

 * The alt for the Donatella picture needs changing, same reason as the Wale picture.
 * I think it's fine. A lot of alt's note what the person is wearing. — Calvin999  17:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Many wrongs don't make a right. Literally,  would suffice.


 * Unless you have a source for critical acclaim, remove it. Let the sources speak for themselves.
 * We don't use sources for "mixed reviews" or "positive reviews". But okay. — Calvin999  17:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Allmusic → AllMusic
 * ? — Calvin999  17:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Goodness me what was I on when I wrote this, corrected my original note.  Azealia 911  talk


 * HitFix shouldn't be in italics
 * Again, try and switch up the flow in the latter paragraph, I'm seeing four concurrent uses of "*writer* of *publication* ..."

Chart performance

 * debuted at number 45 in the Wallonia region of Belgium → debuted at number 45 on the Belgium chart, in the region of Wallonia
 * It also debuted → The song also entered

Live performance

 * Remove only time, the source doesn't specify that it's the only time the song is being performed.

Credits and personnel

 * Move the sentence about the liner notes to the top of the section.

Charts

 * I'm a bit confused, the lead mentions that the song entered Ultratip, but the commercial performance and charts section doesn't mention anything about it? If it did only peak at 14 on Ultratip and not Ultratop, this needs mentioning, because you've just equivalently said a song peaked at 14 on the Billboard Hot 100 when it only peaked at 14 on the Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles.
 * Make the columns sortable
 * Not needed. They are already alphabetical. And there's no need to sort a table with only three rows. — Calvin999
 * GAON → Gaon
 * I see a star next to the sales figures, which indicates sales figures based on certification alone, but, there's no certification?
 * That's pre-loaded. — Calvin999  17:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there nothing you can do?  Azealia 911  talk
 * No, it's pre-loaded in the coding for the template. — <b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>  18:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Either remove the N/A template, or customize it with something like None

Release history

 * Move the references to whichever they are sourcing, as in move one reference next to Urban contemporary radio and one next to Rhythmic contemporary radio
 * Def Jam Recordings → Def Jam, per the infobox.