Talk:You Missed

Sourcing problem
Much of the article is sourced to a Forbes.com piece by Hugh McIntyre. This presents several problems. One is that the article, which went up on the site at 6:30 PM on the 14th, had already been taken down by 1:42 AM the next day. Even allowing for any time zone difference between Forbes and the archive, that page had not been up for half a day, and Forbes usually leaves things up for many years -- this appears to have been some form of a retraction. Another problem is that the author, McIntyre, is listed as a "Senior Contributor"... which in Forbes terminology means that their website hosts his blog, and that per WP:FORBESCON, we treat it as a self-published source. This means not only that we can only us it at all if McIntyre is a recognized expert in his field (and he may be, I am unfamiliar with him), but that even then, we cannot use this source for any statements about the musical artist himself. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 18:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * This is just a typical request to delete content someone does not like. There are plenty of other references than the ones mentioned in by the requester. This should be easily denied as there are references to the raise of the song from other sources that track their own numbers.(Itunes for example.) 2603:6011:FF0:8B00:5ECE:AB25:5A80:6B31 (talk) 15:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I have no opinion on the content sourced to this (barring the one sentence I already removed as misrepresenting the source.) I am an experienced Wikipedia editor noting sourcing concerns. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you have any sources that demonstrate notability? All I can find is a The Sun article (not reliable) a Forbes.com blog piece (not reliable), a MRCTV article (not reliable), and a Sportskeeda article (not reliable). I was genuinely expecting more coverage when I found this article but there just isn't any.  C F A   💬  15:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)