Talk:You Win or You Die/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Right. I'll review this one, and make copyedits as I go and jot notes below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * like the other article, some reception/out-of-universe material needed in lead (which is a little on the slim side)
 * Added. Jclemens (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Can we link Sandy Brae somewhere....
 * We don't appear to have an article on it. I'll see what I can find... Jclemens (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay - I do sorta wish there was more out-of-universe material, but I reckon you've scoured whatever and wherever there is to scour. Hang on a sec, will bring out the green hot-cross buns. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks again, Cas. Jclemens (talk) 23:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)