Talk:Young Citizen Volunteers (1912)

Untitled
Is there a guideline for date formats, because "the September 10, 1912" sounds odd to me. Cordless Larry 13:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Fixed. It was probably a typo of sorts. --Mal 12:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ycv 340.gif
Image:Ycv 340.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite
Just to explain, I rewrote the First World War section as it was about the 36th (Ulster) Division in general rather than the YCV specifically and also had a somewhat less than neutral tone. I had explained this in my first attempt to edit but it was lost thanks to an edit conflict from some bot or other so I'm explaining here to avoid accusations of removing material (all of which was unsourced anyway). Cheers. Keresaspa (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Split?
Also should this be one or two articles? I'm not sure and would like to get some other views before any decision is taken that way but the two phases do seem quite distinct and there is no direct continuity between the two groups that claimed the name. Keresaspa (talk) 19:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No objections after two and a half months so I went ahead and split the articles. Keresaspa (talk) 00:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)