Talk:Your Love (Nicki Minaj song)

edit
In the release history section, change the Mainstream radio date from June 21 to June 15. as the Source given now says June 15 not June 22.


 * ✅ Avic enna sis @ 07:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * wow I am so happy to hear you sing a song and watch you perform wonderfully great 🥰🥰 41.114.155.67 (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Composition
I think that the section about composition is needless and is sloppily worded, even if it was necessary. Hip-hop/rap/R&B songs, if they sample at all, are generally made in the same way. Obviously there will be additional instrumentation alongside the original sample, and so it is probably unnecessary to include quotes from other sources and say something that isn't already implied by the genre that Your Love is classified in. Echoghost (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Your Love Single cover(s)
Both covers were released and cited. The first one (Minaj smirking to her right) was released promotionally and officially as the cover and was used by sites such as Rap-Up, AOL and many other blogs/sites that reviewed the song. The cover was changed for the iTunes release, which happens to so far be the only release the song has gotten. Both covers should be included in the article since both are official covers. Theuhohreo (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There is discussion, because the cover was not even a promotional cover. Because Rap-Up and AOL use the cover mean nothing, they are not Young Money/Cash Money/Universal Motown. The definition of a promotional single is "is a recording issued on Vinyl, 8-track, Cassette, CD, MP3, VHS, DVD, or Blu-ray." So that means the official cover is considered "the promotional cover" It is not an official cover, if it were than a remix or single or something would have been released with that cover. If another editor sees this anyway the image would be deleted because it fails NFCC #8. Candyo32 (talk) 15:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Remixes
The song has had 3 remixes released (so far by July 19) which include remixes by Flo Rida, Sean Paul and an Urban Remix. I believe the song should include a new section for remixes. Theuhohreo (talk) 01:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * First of all, none of these remixes have been deemed official. Second, for a remixes section to be in use, there must be extensive coverage of remix not just one or two sentences about a few unofficial remixes (see Turnin Me On). For most official remixes they don't even warrant a whole section (see the Background of I Invented Sex). Candy  o32  01:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The song has so far had 3 remixes and the music video isn't even out yet. Although none are official they have been reviewed and even commented on by Minaj herself. I already added the section if it still isn't notable enough than just delete it. Theuhohreo (talk) 02:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I moved it to the Background because unofficial remixes still aren't notable to warrant a full section. Also its no need in making a bulleted list of remixes when its in prose. Also unlike Flo Rida and Sean Paul, "Urban Noize" is definitely not notable so per Wikipedia's notablity standars it shouldn't be used, especially since it is unofficial at that. Btw, Twitter is not a reliable source, even if it is a verified account. Candy  o32  02:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I understand moving the remixes to the background, but I don't understand why the Urban Noize Mix isn't added along with the others... Because they are all "unofficial" remixes so wouldn't they all get "treated" the same? Theuhohreo (talk) 13:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * As I've stated, although unofficial, Flo Rida and Sean Paul are well-known rappers. "Urban Noize" isn't a well known remix treatment, such as Dave Audes or example. Candy  o32  14:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Music video
ughh i can't understand why the reference #18 is messing up like that on the bottom! it's annoying me!!!! lol I can't see anything wrong with it -___- Theuhohreo (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * the ref tags had different names. One was "idolator" and the other was "idolatorreview." So I made them both the same. Candy  o32  16:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * i couldn't for the life of me fix that! lol Theuhohreo (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Music video photo
i think their should be a better photo for the music video pictures. pictures that better describe the video because those screen caps aren't really the best... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.145.226 (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ Those are fine. It is depicting the battle scene, it is better to have a cap from something important in the video rather than just any shot from the video. Candy  o32  18:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed the photo to illustrate the artistic use of fabrics as scenery. Might leave, depends on the reception between both photos. Theuhohreo (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

i was thinking about someone putting pics up of minaj bleeding that red cloth in the end and the blue cloth under the bridge where they meet??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.145.226 (talk) 18:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That doesn't sound like a bad idea but I think the pictures are fine for now. Maybe changed later if I can get a better screen-shot. Theuhohreo (talk) 19:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

link to music video?
ive been searching and i cannot find the link. plz help anybody? (98.231.218.47 (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC))

First single
I just watched a three-hour Minaj video on Ustream and she says that "Massive Attack" isn't on the album, so how can we call it the lead single?
 * your must have heard wrong because other sites (http://www.theboombox.com/2010/08/04/nicki-minaj-turns-pink-on-debut-album/) state otherwise and their are many others. Nicki even stated in an interview that when she heard the song she told Garrett that that is the direction she wanted the album to go in. If anything it should be left the way it is until the album release in a couple of months... Theuhohreo (talk) 18:38, 4 August 2010 (UTC)