Talk:Yuanshan, Yilan

Taiwanlove
I've figured that User:Taiwanlove edits exactly like User:Nationalist.--Jerrypp772000 00:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It has been confirmed that Taiwanlove is a sock puppet of Nationalist. That's why they edit in a similar way!--Jerrypp772000 22:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Taiwan
/ and, even though similar discussion are also going on in Talk:Jhunan, Miaoli and Talk:Guantian, Tainan, but I want to explain this to you all in case you forget. Technically, both Taiwan and ROC, not Taiwan, ROC though, would work here, but Taiwan would be more appropriate because of the WP:NC (common names) and also because it is less confusing. Plus, this city or township is located on the island of Taiwan anyways.

I understand that the naming conventions for Chinese say it should be ROC (Taiwan) or Taiwan (ROC), which are fine for me, but I think it is my right to ignore those naming conventions if those conventions would make this confusing. However, if you have to be stubborn, and not reasonable, I might be able report you but I won't, since Taiwan (ROC) is fine, Taiwan only is just better. But at least give the reason why you don't like Taiwan, Taiwan (ROC), or ROC (Taiwan). Thanks.--Jerrypp772000 22:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, then Why Dont I IGNORE you and do whatever I want. Follow the CHinese NAMING CONVENTIONS. -Nationalist 22:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep it cool. Yeah, I mean, if you have a good reason, go ahead. But do you have the reason to ignore the third opinion given in Talk:Guantian, Tainan?--Jerrypp772000 22:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * So yeah, obviously User:Nationalist didn't have any good reasons for ignoring the naming conventions for common names and the third opinion in Talk:Guantian, Tainan. And since no one else disagreed with me, I would change it back to Taiwan only. If anyone wants to add (ROC), that would be fine. Otherwise, please discuss first. Thanks.--Jerrypp772000 22:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I've just noticed that edited this article without discussion. So obviously, he disagrees with me but without a good reason. I would like him to discuss with me first before making another edit.--Jerrypp772000 01:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, now I see that Sid212 is a confirmed sock puppet of Nationalist. I think it is kind of weird that Nationalist would do anything to edit these articles without discussion in the talk pages. I mean if he thinks he's right, he should discuss and let us know what he thinks and stuff. And now there's, who might be another sock puppet of his.--Jerrypp772000 18:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * So now I'm kind of confused. I think, or , , and , are the only editor who disagree with using Taiwan only. But they wouldn't discuss.--Jerrypp772000 23:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)