Talk:Yugo-Vostochnaya (Moscow Metro)

Article title
User:Ezhiki "Ezhiki moved page Yugo-Vostochnaya (Moscow Metro) to Yugo-Vostochnaya: name not ambiguous (except for gender)", but that is not true. There is a planned station with that name in SPB. Please stop these nonsence anti-disambiguation moves. 77.179.196.58 (talk) 03:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * An article title is considered to be ambiguous only when another article exists that can occupy the same space (see WP:D). Since there is no article about the planned station in St. Petersburg, there is no ambiguity here as far as the guidelines are concerned. Once that article is created, this one can be moved back (when that happens, feel free to ping me if help is needed). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 21, 2017 ; 15:07 (UTC)
 * User:Ezhiki, that's shit Ezhiki. You support that users establish links to this article and then later these have to be disambiguated. And disambiguation editors that don't know the topic or don't care enoug to work correctly all too often make wrong decisions in that process. This page here should be a disambiguation page, they exist also for red-linked items. Please undo your disruption of page creation and linking processes. 78.49.252.23 (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I made no argument that it shouldn't be a disambiguation page (or, rather, a redirect to an existing disambiguation page, where these entries needed to be included). To disambiguate, one needs to have in place other articles which can be located at the same title, or at the very least a set of WP:DABRL-compliant entries demonstrating the ambiguity. I moved the article because neither of those conditions was satisfied. Now that the disambiguation page was expanded (thank you for that), the situation has changed, so I moved it back. Simple as that. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 26, 2017 ; 15:07 (UTC)

Deceptive statement?
User:Ezhiki wrote "An article title is considered to be ambiguous only when another article exists that can occupy the same space (see WP:D)" - but the word "only" appears four times in that section and never it seems to be used to construct a claim like the one made by Ezhiki. Can someone cite the exact phrase or a more restricted part of the section from which one could derive what Ezhiki claims? 78.49.252.23 (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation page
User:Ezhiki moved the article to a title that should be used for a disambiguation page or a redirect to a disambiguation page, he didn't even bother to create Yugo-Vostochnaya (disambiguation), so one could properly link from this article to find other existing topics. 78.49.252.23 (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't be bothered to create the whole Wikipedia, so I left something for you to do, too :) Moving this back now. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 26, 2017 ; 14:58 (UTC)