Talk:Yugoslav torpedo boat T2/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * She also laid minefields; could this be merged with the previous sentence, because laying minefields is a general task, there is no need to mention it as a separate sentence✅
 * Section 1;
 * Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino; I think this is not an English name, if so, put on the italics✅
 * Section 2;
 * Inconsistency in figures of full load displacement✅
 * 320 tonnes (310 long tons); prose
 * 320 t (315 long tons); infobox
 * In the previous section, it is said that the requirement was "sustaining 30 knots (56 km/h) for 10 hours", here it is "980 nautical miles (1,810 km; 1,130 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)", so this satisfy the requirement. Mention it clearly.
 * I don't think it follows that the stated performance necessarily met the criteria.
 * Section 3;
 * were involved in the shelling of various Italian shore-based targets known as the Bombardment of Ancona; to a general reader it creates a confusion whether the "shelling" is known as "Bombardment of Ancona" or the "shore-based targets", make it clearer✅
 * 7.4% confidence, violation unlikely
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 09:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, Krishna! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)