Talk:Yugoslav torpedo boat T7/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 12:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Section 1; "to the Strait during darkness", I suggest replacing "darkness" with "night", a better word.
 * Section 2; para 1; Mention metres in full on first mention, 58.5 m (191 ft 11 in), I suggest removing |abbr=on Also the same with other units, shp, nmi etc.
 * Section 2; para 2; "66 mm (2.6 in)L/30" space required between "66 mm (2.6 in)" and "L/30"


 * Section 2; para 2; "82 F – 97 F" to "82–97 F"
 * Section 2; para 2; In the last sentence on the first mention of "96 F" add "later renamed T7" or a similar one, in paranthesis. Because in the following the paras a reader would not be able to understand why the 96 F is given importance. The same happened to me.


 * Section 3.1; Link World War I, per WP:REPEATLINK
 * Section 3.2; In May and June 1929 -> In May–June 1929
 * Section 3.2; Link submarine
 * Section 3.2; Remove the dup-links of Bay of Kotor, Šibenik and Rijeka
 * Section 3.2; para 1; All four F-group boats were then captured by the Italians, what about "T7"? In the next para it is mentioned that T7 was operated by Italians, but not mentioned that it was captured.
 * Section 3.2; para 2; she and the S-boats, which country's S-boats?
 * Section 3.3; 21 crew were rescued by the MTBs + capturing five more crew, makes a total of 26, what about the others. The crew was 38
 * Lead; para 1; Link Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes


 * Infobox; There is a consistency error with the prose, where the complement is mentioned as 38. Also just the number is enough, no need to mention "officers and enlisted"
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 15:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review Krishna, all done except the captured crew. I've also clarified that sources differ on the original crew strength. I'm afraid it isn't clear what the strength of the crew was in Italian or German hands, and the source doesn't say what happened to the rest (if there was any). These are my edits. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)