Talk:Yusef Khan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewer: Mayhem  Mario  18:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Right here I go, on the request from the nomiantor GSorby to review this article.

Refs

 * Ref No.10 is a dead link so 1) should be tagged, and two can be archived as it is a Holy Soap ref.
 * Duplicate ref Kilkelly, Daniel. "More 'EastEnders' chat from Nina Wadia". Digital Spy. http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s2/eastenders/scoop/a312016/more-eastenders-chat-from-nina-wadia.html. Retrieved 4 July 2011.

Minor Deatils

 * "Fans call me Dr Evil." [17] not neeeded, in reception
 * Tariq is not linked.
 * 'the scenes aired on the 2 June 2011'
 * Nina Wadia and Zainab Masood are linked 5 times in this article.
 * Linking problems with Digital Spy to (linked 3 times),
 * Masood Ahmed and Nitin Ganatra linked 3 times, overlinking!
 * There are a lot of DS sources with no publisher info in them.
 * 'Mirror.co.uk' chanegd to Daily Mirror?
 * Whilst editing it I noticed that for a few sources it is written as |publisher=Digital Spy which is wrong, should be work=Digital Spy, sort it out for a few of them.
 * Delete Tamwar Masood form 'Other Relatives' as not related by blood. (i think)
 * Caption for image?

Review

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose needs a lot of work, see above.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): (citations to reliable sources):  (OR):
 * See above.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Comments above
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail
 * For this article I would fail it though if I see you can make the improvements, it would be great. Thats why I put it on hold, but I think you put the article up for GA to premature as you can see all the highlighted things above. Needs work- on hold for 7 days. Mayhem  Mario  18:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Um, editors are granted seven days to complete tasks. Though some reviewers will hold the review open for longer. - JuneGloom    Talk  18:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry! It was a typo! One of many.... Mayhem  Mario  18:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Mario, I don't feel you should be reviewing this considering you made edits to the list entry before it was split off. Therefore parts of this article are attributed to you. – anemone projectors – 10:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * For this article I would fail it though if I see you can make the improvements, it would be great. Thats why I put it on hold, but I think you put the article up for GA to premature as you can see all the highlighted things above. Needs work- on hold for 7 days. Mayhem  Mario  18:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Um, editors are granted seven days to complete tasks. Though some reviewers will hold the review open for longer. - JuneGloom    Talk  18:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry! It was a typo! One of many.... Mayhem  Mario  18:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Mario, I don't feel you should be reviewing this considering you made edits to the list entry before it was split off. Therefore parts of this article are attributed to you. – anemone projectors – 10:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay I've finished with the fixes. What about now? .. 'George Sorby •  Talk  •  Contribs''  .. 14:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Look, I shouldnt be reviweing this, as i have contributed to this article in the list. I think im going to fail it, then you can nominate it again, so someone outside Wp:EE can review it. I hope that when it is reviewed again it will pass. Mayhem  Mario  14:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)