Talk:Yuva Unstoppable

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because YUVA Unstoppable is a non profit, non- governmental organisation which works for the upliftment of underprivileged students.
 * All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view. This article tells the Yuva Unstoppable story from the Yuva Unstoppable point of view. This makes it inherently promotional. —teb728 t c 10:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I have rewritten it enough to deal with that objection, but it still needs more work to use the sources given. – Fayenatic  L ondon 17:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

How to remove multiple issues template
Hello, previously I added newspaper links, and those were deleted by the publisher after a year now those are deleted and the reference link is mentioned in a uniform manner.My question is how to remove the notice thing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2020satiya (talk • contribs) 02:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * User:2020satiya You are not going to succeed in getting the notice removed just by doing more promotional editing. Your promotional editing is the problem.  Do we need to request that you be topic-banned from this article?  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Robert McClenon Please help me with what lines you think are promotional I have edited the whole thing and someone else also edited this again with changing the words and I also gave citations from reputed news websites. Please help me if there is something to improve in this I will follow all guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2020satiya (talk • contribs) 21:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No, User:2020satiya, I am not going to write the article for you so as to be both neutral and promotional at the same time. I would not be doing that for you even if it could be done.  You may ask for general advice from other experienced editors at the Teahouse, or you may ask them for advice about editing an article where you are trying to promote your organization.  It is true that Wikipedia requires references to reliable sources, but that does not mean that all edits that refer to reliable sources will be accepted.  Read the neutral point of view policy again.  Then read the second pillar of Wikipedia policy again.  Maybe you are wasting your time and ours by trying to edit the whole thing over and over again.  Do we need to request that you be topic-banned from this article?  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

First of all, thank you for whatever contribution you are doing for the whole community and some of your advices are really nice I must appreciate that. I will try taking help from tea house. Also i am not trying to promote this organization just putting information which is necessary. we come in news often but i learnt here that wikipedia is not a facebook page that i will put every article here. Hence i am putting only notable articles which makes difference to lots of people. I hope you understand only important articles with reputed references are posted. I will also read this the second pillar of Wikipedia. Please don't ban me from this topic i am still learning and after that i will help this community again from whatever i have learned here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2020satiya (talk • contribs) 00:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * As you have a WP:Conflict of interest, please desist from editing the article. Instead, make suggestions on this talk page, which other editors can assess and then incorporate if appropriate. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for informing that Fayenatic but there is a error which was placed in 2013 for "This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (February 2013)" for which there is only one link right now which is the website of the ngo. i tried removing that but i don't know how it came back and there is no reason mentioned. Please help me for this how to remove this unnecessary tags — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2020satiya (talk • contribs) 10:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Paid editing/sockpuppeting
Just a heads up that 2020satiya above, who had also declared as a paid editor at one point, was confirmed to be a sock along with two other editors who worked on this page: Sikanji and Gujaratiworld24. The latter two denied Paid editing or COI prior to the SPI. They, as in the one person operating the three accounts, were reasonably savvy (7.5/10 level), so keep an eye out for future promotion. I have accordingly tagged the article for UPE.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)