Talk:Z-spread

Questions
Isn't the Z-Spread typically to the Treasury curve instead of the swap curve?
 * Yes. I've corrected that. Finnancier (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

-> It is market convention to spread both versus treasuries or swaps curves, depends on what you're analyzing, on the MBS/Muni scope the T-curve makes more sense but it's not the case with Corps. This article could use an upgrade to expand the scope and encompass the discussion in the Corps world, I will try to get some book to proper reference.

-> Where is the reference for the information that negative Z-Spreads is an indicator of future recession? that is vague and quite broad. Recession is a pretty defined concept and I believe this part should be taken out of the article until reference is shown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gansinho (talk • contribs) 03:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Agreed with Gansinho and removed inappropriate mention of recession. Future recession is often indicated by negative Yield Curve (slope), not Z-Spread. —Patrug (talk) 07:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose that Yield curve spread be merged into Z-spread for the following reasons.
 * The use of the term yield curve spread to refer to MBS is limited, according to a Google search.
 * The term yield curve spread more intuitively refers to the shape of the yield curve, hence its name.
 * Both yield curve spread and Z-spread are flat spreads over Treasuries. Because they refer to the same thing, they should have the same page.
 * The yield curve spread page should be expanded to include explanations of why a negative yield curve spread is seen as a predictor of future recessions. Finnancier (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Agree with proposal Fintor (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * These issues all seem to be resolved. Yield curve spread now re-directs to Yield curve (disambiguation), which includes Yield curve and Z-spread. The Yield curve page explains the linkage to recession. —Patrug (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Z-Spread Definition is Incorrect
I am not interested in becoming an editor on Wikipedia, so will not be making the change myself. However, the Z-Spread (or Zero Volatility Spread) definition is incorrect. The spread is not added to spot rates, but is added to forward rates. To discount a cash flow, you need to discount each period by a chain of rates, each one being the Forward rate plus the spread.

The mistake made here is a common one, and is all over the Internet (e.g., Investopedia has the same mistake, as does the CFA study guide). The mistake was caused by an unclear statement in Fabozzi. The correct formula can be found in Tuckman and Serrat's book on Fixed Income. It can also be found in the original paper on Option-Adjusted Spreads by Mark Gordon and Michael Waldman, who were two of the people who created Option-Adjusted Spread Analysis.

Note, the OAS Spread definition in Wikipedia is also unclear. OAS is also discounted by adding the spread to each sample forward rate and discounted to the present. In fact, the Z-Spread is simply an OAS spread using an interest rate model with the noise term (volatility) set to zero.

For anyone who wants to correct this, I will be happy to discuss it further. I can be reached at mtaranto@rhsmith.umd.edu I have a solid background in this area. I built the OAS/Z-Spread models at both Lehman Brothers and Kidder, Peabody. I worked for and learned from Mark Gordon, one of the originators of this field. I also have a PhD in Finance from Berkeley and have taught at MIT, Wharton and Maryland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkTaranto (talk • contribs) 01:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Done, professor. (You probably could've revised the article yourself in less time than it took to write your missive!) —Patrug (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

ZV is different from Z-spread
(This is my first time posting on Wikipedia, so forgive my ignorance of any/all protocols.)

The Zero Vol spread is different than the Z-spread. The ZV, or ZVO more commonly, for an MBS is the spread over a reference curve using a single interest rate path & thus returning a single prepayment vector. This is contrasted with the OAS which utilizes multiple interest rate paths & thus multiple prepayment vectors. The difference between the ZVO and OAS is the Option Cost.

My point is that the first sentence in the entry states that the ZV spread is a spread over the Treasury curve, but I do not think that is accurate. It can be over whatever reference curve you choose. If you use LIBOR, you will have a LIBOR ZVO & LIBOR OAS. If you use UST's, you will have a Treasury ZVO & Treasury OAS. Dlsmith1855 (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)