Talk:ZX Spectrum/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Sinclair ZX Spectrum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * The lead needs to be expanded to adequately summarise the article.


 * "... you could switch between 48k basic programming with the keywords already discussed ...". Should avoid use of personal pronouns.


 * The text of the Peripherals section is squeezed between left- and right-aligned images.


 * There is an external link in the Community section. External links should only appear in the External link section.


 * There has been a request for citation in place since April 2008.


 * Several sections are not adequately cited. For instance, the first paragraph of the Software section claims that "The Spectrum enjoys a vibrant, dedicated fan-base." Great, but who says so? The last half of the Distribution section is also completely uncited, as is the first half of Copying and backup software.


 * "However, for the majority of the software it seems unlikely that any action will ever be taken." Again, who says so?


 * "The Spectrum has an interesting method of handling colour ...". Interesting to who? Unusual? Need to avoid stating a pov.


 * The prose needs some attention in places, for instance: "Pandora had a flat-screen monitor and Microdrives and was intended to be Sinclair's business portable until Alan Sugar bought the computer side of Sinclair, when he took one look at it and ditched it (a conversation with UK computer journalist Guy Kewney went thus: AS: "Have you seen it?" GK: "Yes" AS: "Well then.")

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing, Malleus. I have started by rectifying a few of the points.  Hopefully, more will follow soonish.  --Frodet (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking at these issues. I know it's a PITA when someone like me parachutes in with an unexpected GA review, but it's necessary in view of the significant changes that have been made to the GA criteria since this article was listed. There's no rush when the article's obviously being worked on though. Just let me know when you think you're done. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I have addressed all the issues above - hopefully to your satisfaction. :)  --Frodet (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * That'll do for me. Thank you so much for the effort you've put into this article; you've done the ZX Spectrum proud. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 20:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)