Talk:Zadara

COI hatnote
I usually remove COI hatnotes unless the specific questionable edits are highlighted on the talk page - otherwise, further edits are inadvertently discouraged. In this case, it's pretty easy to see which edits are raising suspicions, so I'm adding this section instead of removing the hatnote. The creator and another recent editor with single purpose accounts have been adding promotional and marketing verbiage which is being reverted. Anyone looking at the edit history can see what's happening.Timtempleton (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Article's editing history
This article has a somewhat troubled history. It was flagged for inside editing and was stripped of a lot of info before the remaining info was nominated for deletion. The nomination was withdrawn due to no consensus, but I completely rewrote the article anyway to get it to GA status. A difference of opinion about what is notable ensued, with further additional editing, and more info being removed. To save future editors the trouble of initiating another deletion nomination without seeing the full version, I'm including a link to the version I completed before it was pared down [].Timtempleton (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Is Techseen a reliable source?
I've never heard of them, but they just published an interview with Zadara's Chief Architect, about a product that isn't in the article.[].Timtempleton (talk) 19:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)