Talk:Zadvydas v. Davis

Untitled
NPOV issue: This article is written in a way that expresses strong disapproval of the Court's decision in the case. It focuses only on the negative impacts (in part through the use of a long quote) and possible ways to negate the decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F140:400:2185:2D1A:B4EF:81C9:C8C (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Significantly revised the article. Although the quote was left in, it was balanced with opposing viewpoints.  In the same way, the POV language on negating the decision was balanced with information showing that the proposed bill was likely unconstitutional.   GregJackP   Boomer!   13:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)