Talk:Zagreb Synagogue/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments:
 * There are low-level grammar and syntax issues. I suggest a good third-party editor give this a once over. You might be able to get some help from WP:GOCE.✅
 * Measurements should be converted using convert, e.g. 80 meters. ✅
 * Zagreb City Museum is already in the text (and in red). Perhpas unlink them in the captions? ✅

Summary: There are just some small issues that should not be too difficult to resolve. I will put this article On Hold for for the moment. Let's try and improve these areas in this time.

Final comments: Thanks for all the hard work in making this a better article. I am now satisfied that it meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as such. -- S Masters (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your consideration, this is great news. Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this article! GregorB (talk) 11:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)