Talk:Zero

Makes no sense
This change does not quite make sense (given the circumstances). Please talk about such edits before acting upon them. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Zero disambiguation makes more sense. It makes much more sense than your useless revert. If somebody is looking for the actual number they would search for 0 and not zero. Zero is the name of many different things other than a number. Gune (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Uh, that's sort of the purpose of Zero (disambiguation). The article Zero is about the primary topic, which is the number. If a page move is what you're asking for, file a request at WP:RPM, though I doubt you'll have much luck with that. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

No. I'm talking about the redirect. It should redirect to the disambiguation page and not the actual number since there are many more uses for the word zero than just a number. In fact most people wouldn't even search zero if they were looking for the number. They would instead search for 0. Gune (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Get WP:CONSENSUS then. That's all there is to it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Now you apparently think you have consensus to keep it directed to the number 0? Do you always like to make shit up? Gune (talk) 03:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Watch the language. And again, if you care so much, start a move discussion. Guess WP:WPDAB should know about this ... Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

In Our Time
Rich Farmbrough, 03:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC).