Talk:Zero-K

Ref makes no sense
The articles only ref is not linked in any way to the information provided in the Gameplay section. I do not know where to move or whether to remove it. -Skasi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.114.155.197 (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

General Terms
I think that the top part of the article should be moved to a section called "history."

Any sentence that starts with "Initially" and compares the game to others in its engine seems more like a discussion of provenance than the subject at hand (Zero-K itself).

- ScarySquirrel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.199.195.106 (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Is this verifiable? Zero K removes all possible interface limitations.

Londonbridgebridge (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Seconding Londonbridgebridge to some extent... I read down to the heading which said "gameplay" and then gave up. Partly because I'm drinking too much to read this sort of thing and partly because it read like an advertisement. The article makes some strange claims - if they're true, that's awesome, but they didn't seem objective. Maybe it's just the wording... "obscene" numbers of units? I'm only offended by prime numbers falling between 12 and 60, so I sure hope I don't see any of those! 219.89.192.227 (talk) 11:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Improved the standard of English and reformatted
On the June 26th 2013 I moved some sections and improved the English. I changed things like having the note about performance problems in the gameplay section and changed some of the bits that could be taken to be overt propaganda. - TheSponge — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.176.166.121 (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Zero-K and TA
Zero-K is essentially a portable .NET bootstrapper/lobby application for TA, which can, in addition to playing ZK content, act as a regular portable lobby executable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.173.12.68 (talk) 07:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)