Talk:Zerox

Proposed merge with Zerox Machine
same song, per WP:NSONGS Richhoncho (talk) 13:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm all for it.


 * Given the entire contents of that article were already in this one, it's clearly already happened, so I just made that a redirect here - David Gerard (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 1 March 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved; former history moved to Zerox (fictional planet). – wbm1058 (talk) 00:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Zerox (song) → Zerox – No mentions of Zerox in the Superman article outside of the hatnote. Doesn’t appear to be a majorly notable comic character, while the song was a hit for multiple bands. Hatnote could be reversed, but not if DABNOMENTION applies. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 02:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Songs has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. Nothing more than an obscure part of Superman mythos. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 02:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Don't forget to remove the hatnote from the Superman article and add one about the company & photocopier to the song article. As long as the Superman article doesn't mention Zerox, there's no need to mention that one. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose Nothing about this song strikes me as notable, should probably be merged to Dirk Wears White Sox. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Multiple recordings of it charted in the UK. How isn't it notable? QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 01:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * "Charting" is not sufficient to be notable. Per WP:NSONG, "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." It only says that charting increases the probability a song is notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I guess I'm just so used to how much less restrictive the rest of NMUSIC is (especially NALBUM) that I forgot how tight that section in particular is. Frankly, I doubt that language would hold up to current consensus if tested. I have seen too many AfDs where the article gets kept on charting alone, and much weaker charting than this. In fact, I might actually bring that up at WT:SONG tomorrow if I remember (I will ping you if I do, assuming you'd want a piece of that conversation). And regardless, this still makes a far stronger case for notability than the Superman character, so it should still be PTOPIC at least until an AfD is brought against it. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 06:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)