Talk:Zeta Tau Alpha/Archive 1

Is this sorority still restricted? If so, that ought to be mentioned FlaviaR 19:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Restricted? How so? This is the first time I've heard any mention of this.. --ImmortalGoddezz 19:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Secret motto?
Should the secret motto … be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.159.92 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment edited to delete the alleged motto. —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * If it's secret, no. It can't be included unless it can be found in a reliable source; if it's published that widely, then it's not secret. —C.Fred (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * And a Google search on the motto you mentioned returns two results, neither of which have a connection to the sorority. —C.Fred (talk) 22:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I guess its not a secret anymore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.97.110 (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Putting this issue to bed
An anonymous editor blanked out basically the entire comment starting the section above yesterday. I went for the courtesy cut and deleted the actual text of the motto. (Which, yes, it's still in edit history, but it isn't out on display on the talk page now.) Even though it's been anonymous IPs raising the issue, I agree that there's no point in displaying the motto without sources, even on the talk page.

If anybody has issues with the treatment, discuss it here rather than continuing to hack up the comments above. Or, for that matter, should the section just be archived altogether? —C.Fred (talk) 21:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Archive would be my vote. If it's archived then theoretically the issue is put to bed and shouldn't be brought up anymore. I don't think I've ever had an issue with somebody (user or IP) modifying comments (even about things such as mottos) after they've been archived. --ImmortalGoddezz 21:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)