Talk:Zetron

Writing Improvement
Please fix the any issue of the wording if possible. I do not have any interest of the company ZETRON, but I wanted to share the emergency dispatch communications systems. Example) Previously,I saw the news that there was long delay of the fire car because of the faulty of emergency dispatch communications systems.  Safety of people regarding technology is one of my concerns.  Goodtiming8871 (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The compatibility issue mentioned at the bottom of the Zetron page deals with a competitor product, not a Zetron product. It is erroneous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RollsKanardly (talk • contribs) 20:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've revised the text to make clear that it was the Zetron product being incompatible with the new product. —C.Fred (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

It is one of major three subsidiary companies of JVCKenwood , Kenwood Corporation Other two subsidiary companies are already registered on Wikipedia. Please see the details

Subsidiaries
As per the growing natural disaster and climate change, It would be beneficial for public to know the overview of the mission-critical communication solutions on the field : Fire, Ambulance and Police. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 02:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * EF Johnson Technologies - Multi-Band portable radio company
 * Zetron - provider of mission-critical communication solutions
 * Victor Entertainment - distributes music, movies and other entertainment products

Abilene FD story deals with a competitor. (per the first two sentences of the article. http://www.ktxs.com/news/abilene-fire-department-frustrated-with-new-911-dispatch-system/517295848) RollsKanardly (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect Information
The article referencing "faulty dispatch" deals with another company, Spillman Technologies. The page was not authorized by anyone at or with Zetron. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RollsKanardly (talk • contribs) 20:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The article mentions that Abilene is spending about $150,000 to upgrade their Zetron equipment, which was previously mentioned as "outdated and [not] compatible with the Spillman system". —C.Fred (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Pages do not need to be authorized by anyone, Anyone can write an article about any notable subject they want to.  ~ GB fan 22:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The article also mentions that the issues and frustration is with the newer 9-1-1 system from Spillman.RollsKanardly (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Move to Zetron?
It appears that Zetron is the common rendering of the name. I'm inclined to move it to Zetron. Is there any reason not to move the article? For instance, is ZETRON an initialism? —C.Fred (talk) 20:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC) I agree with the common name 'Zetron' although ZETRON is the brand mark, 'Zetron' is a habitual name. It would be proper to redirect ZETRON to 'Zetron'. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The proper rendering is Zetron.RollsKanardly (talk) 23:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)