Talk:Zhu Bajie

Nine-Toothed Rake Merger Proposal
I propose that the content of the article Nine-toothed Rake, limited as it is and specific as it is to the topic of Zhu Bajie himself, be merged into this article. Mendaliv (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. Having watched much of a DVD series of Xiyouji many years ago, I don't think an article on Zhu Bajie's weapon could be that long. Sun Wukong's magical wand doesn't even have an article to itself. Even the Chinese Wikipedia does not have an article on the rake. Mathpianist93 (talk) 01:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Horse sense. I will merge now. I'm wondering why the article is called Zhu Bajie though, and not Pigsy? Homunculus (duihua) 12:00, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. It's amazing that that request had been standing for two years. Homunculus (duihua) 12:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Zhu Bajie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120802022436/http://afe.easia.columbia.edu:80/webcourse/key_points/kp_4.htm to http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/webcourse/key_points/kp_4.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

There are 4, not 3 helper
the wiki about journey to the west often says that Tang Sanzang has 3 helpers but it is 4, people usually forget the dragon white horse

"Edacious"
Thus seems like a very obscure word for a common concept (gluttonous). Is there a reason for preferring it?

While I'm on the subject, "demerits" seems like the wrong word for "flaws" or "defects." All of these have been in the article since 2012, so I guess someone is committed to them. But they seem awkward. Thoughts?  &middot; rodii &middot;  16:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

I agree that edacious is an unusual word; I don't think I've ever seen it. Gluttony instead?

However I do like the parallelism of merit/demerit -- the only alternative I can think of at the moment would be positive qualities/negative qualities. -- SSBDelphiki (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2019 (UTC)