Talk:Zhuang logogram

Best considered as a stub?
The term Zhuang logogram could well be treated as a separate article talking about the two types of logorams, however the topic is somewhat limited, and would only be part of a wider topic Zhuang writting systems. Zhuang writting systems is a much better candidate for a separate article which suggests that changing to a true disabiguation page is best. What thoughts do others have? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnkn63 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Of the titles listed:
 * Sawgoek does not seem to have any coverage in reliable sources
 * Sawndip is the existing article on Zhuang logograms
 * Zhuang language is not a a plausible referent of "Zhuang logogram"
 * Zhuang characters is a redundant content fork of Zhuang language, which should be replaced by a redirect to Sawndip
 * This page should be reduced to a redirect to Sawndip, the existing article on this very topic. Kanguole 10:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not that familiar with the topic, so if you feel that redirecting is the way to go, I have no objection. --Elonka 15:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)