Talk:Zi Corporation

Potential additional controversies
A case where I did not find good enough referrences: -- Egil (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It has been claimed that a key patent contained under the Jiejing Licenses was questionable. Eric Chappell claimed rights to it, but a 1996 UK court decision https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449553/o16596.pdf gave the rights to Ron Thomas and Helmut Stohr (GB Patent no. 2238414 B, https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2238414 https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO1990002992). It is claimed Thomas and Stohr then sold the patent to Tegic, which was then used in the 2002 court case, against Zi.

Nomination for deletion
A request to delete the article was withdrawn after changes were made to the article, see Articles_for_deletion/Zi_Corporation. -- Egil (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)