Talk:ZigBee specification

Merge with ZigBee Article
yes.. What is the difference between this article and the ZigBee article? Should they be merged? 203.63.21.118 (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't see a reason for separate articles. I have put up merge banners. --Kvng (talk) 13:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I support a merge. Bakkster Man (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I disagree. This article has less technically specific details. There seems little redundancy and "mergeing" would really mean "concatenating" only making the article longer. DG12 (talk) 16:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * A longer article is not necessarily a bad thing. It doesn't look like a merge would result in the article being too long. I assume "Less technically specific details" refers to WP:SUMMARY. I don't think we're dealing with a broad enough subject for that to apply. --Kvng (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree. They should be merged. Zigbee is targeted at engineers so the article should include specs.--Mach535 (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)