Talk:Zimmerwald Conference/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 13:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

I'll do this one. Comments (more to follow)
 * the structure does not follow MOS:LAYOUT, both the list of delegates and signatories belongs above "See also"✅
 * citations are needed for a number of statements and paragraphs, I have tagged them.
 * the lead is inadequate to meet MOS:LEAD, and needs to properly summarise the article.
 * marxists.org is not a WP:RS, and should not be used as an External link✅
 * the article seems to be almost entirely drawn from Gankin and Fisher
 * Karl Liebknecht is overlinked

"Gankin and Fisher" is a large collection of primary documents published by the Hoover Institution. I guess I need more secondary sources?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 15:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * G'day. Absolutely. I almost quick failed this nomination due to the missing citations, structural issues and inadequate lead, but I'll put it on hold for seven days if you think you can rectify them all in that time. What do you think? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 21:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Not listed. Missing citations, reliance on a collection of primary sources and inadequate lead. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 08:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)