Talk:Zinc Oxide

concerning GAN nomination
The article has improved significantly thanks to NIMSoffice, but the coverage is highly biased toward electronic materials, which represent relatively minor applications (NIMS is from a materials science institute, so the bias is understandable). The references are mainly to minor hyperspecialized journals (J. Crystal Growth and Design?) describing narrow work of doubtful significance (see Reliable sources). The referencing should instead focus on encyclopedic sources and the coverage should reflect the applications. Sorry for the rough referee report.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: I moved this comment here from WP:GAN, where it did not belong. Looie496 (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)