Talk:Zinnia elegans

Copywrite bot (CorenSearchBot) - it is true Floridata was used as the source - and is attributed but it was not copied --Michael Goodyear (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * While the source was not copied, it does still closely follow the source throughout, which makes this a derivative work and still a copyright problem. For example, the current version of the article says:
 * while the source says:
 * I have bolded your words which are exactly the same as the source and in the same order. The unbolded words are largely either synonyms or rearranged slightly from the source. Please note that this is only an example, most of the article appears to follow the source too closely.
 * I have bolded your words which are exactly the same as the source and in the same order. The unbolded words are largely either synonyms or rearranged slightly from the source. Please note that this is only an example, most of the article appears to follow the source too closely.
 * I have bolded your words which are exactly the same as the source and in the same order. The unbolded words are largely either synonyms or rearranged slightly from the source. Please note that this is only an example, most of the article appears to follow the source too closely.


 * While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. The less creative the expression, the looser copyright applies, but even so close paraphrasing becomes a great concern when there are long passages that include fragments of the original and the structure of the original is retained. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". VernoWhitney (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Zinnia elegans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110714043030/http://www.marthastewart.com/plant/zinnia-elegans-purity to http://www.marthastewart.com/plant/zinnia-elegans-purity

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Zinnienblüte Zinnia elegans stack15 20190722-RM-7222254.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 16, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-12-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)