Talk:Zlib license

I'm fairly sure this is a free software license, but I'd like someone more experienced to mark it as such. In addition, zlib needs to be created. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 02:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Move discussion June 2007

 * Nobody appears to want to actually say what the problem is with the move. I can't believe this is even an issue. The license has several names, none of which really have any claim to being particularly official, and the least convoluted one is "zlib license" as given on the existing article. I can't see any real reason for opposing. Chris Cunningham 12:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

This discussion seems to have developed in User talk:Thumperward. Anthony Appleyard 12:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)