Talk:Zoé (band)

History merge

 * 15:25, 28 February 2016 Graham87 (talk | contribs) moved page Zoé to Zoé (band) (history merge) (revert)
 * 15:25, 28 February 2016 Graham87 (talk | contribs) restored page Zoé (274 revisions restored)
 * 15:24, 28 February 2016 Graham87 (talk | contribs) deleted page Zoé (prepare for history merge)

2011
I'm curious, why I made an edit here and someone has switched it back to the original error already. The sentance "No me destruyas" translates to "You don't destroy me", not "Don't destroy me" "Don't destroy me" would be "No me destruya", similar in spelling, but very different in intention. Even if it were the way the erroneous original poster and correcter were correct, the lyrics within the song would say "don't make me hurt when you cut me.." which makes far less sense then, "now you don't sharpen your knives. now you don't hurt me when you cut me." Anyways, the word 'ya' (already/now) doesn't make much sense in the imperative, but if you are talking about the current state of being as it is now, it does (present tense). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan9800 (talk • contribs) 06:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Correction.. I looked up my old spanish book and found out that negating a 2nd person imperative is identical to a 2nd person present tense, however I still believe this is the correct translation due to context of the rest of the song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.15.43.40 (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I posted my apology for not being familiar with Wikipedia's customs and a rearticulation (this time much clearer) of my argument on 76.93.108.199's talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.216.169 (talk) 11:45, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Zoé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071222111854/http://www.groundcontrolmag.com:80/detail/1/593/ to http://www.groundcontrolmag.com/detail/1/593/
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110715194300/http://www.rockenespanol.com/?artists/zoe to http://www.rockenespanol.com/?artists/zoe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 5 May 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  13:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Zoé → Zoé (band) – Given the number of topics known as Zoé, Zoë, and Zoe, I don't believe that this band should be primary topic. See Zoe (disambiguation) and Zoe (name). 162 etc. (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Some |Zo%C3%AB_(Austrian_singer)|Zo%C3%AB_(British_singer)|Zoe_(name)|Zoe|Zoe_(film) pageviews 162 etc. (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong support others are viewed more and probably have more long-term significance.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 06:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per below.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 16:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong support staggering that this could have squatting in primary topic position. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom, redirect to Zoe.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom—blindlynx (talk) 15:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * |Zo%C3%A9_(reactor)|Zo%C3%A9_(album)|Zo%C3%A9_(Little_Big_Adventure)|Zo%C3%A9_(given_name)|Zo%C3%A9_(band) Here are the pageview stats limited to pages that use the "Zoé" spelling (includes redirects). I don't think it's quite as much of a slamdunk as is being suggested here, assuming you're a believer in WP:SMALLDETAILS. Colin M (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I hadn't noticed that the film and name articles don't use the diacritics, however the name does list people with this diacritic so I'm still not convinced that there's a clear primary topic but yes the move isn't as clear as first thought. SMALLDETAILS does likely apply since anyone intentionally typing the diacritics likely wants a topic with diacritics, the reverse doesn't apply, see Talk:George Puscas (sports writer).  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 16:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)