Talk:Zodiac settle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 18:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

: After a few minor grammatical tweaks, I feel the article complies with MoS policies on grammar, structure, and layout. If I had to guess... (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article contains a small bibliography, but one comprising reliable, third-party sources, and it makes good use of them. There is no evidence of original research embedded in the text. If I had to guess... (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to cover all relevant aspects of its topic for which verifiable information of an encyclopedic nature was available. If I had to guess... (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article shows no signs of bias towards or against its subject. If I had to guess... (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC) . None of the edits the article has received since its creation appear to be disruptive. &#34;We could read for-EVER&#59; reading round the wiki!&#34; (talk) 18:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC) : The article is not presently illustrated, but I, as the reviewer, won't grudge it on simply that reasoning. :) &#34;We could read for-EVER&#59; reading round the wiki!&#34; (talk) 18:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After checking through the article, and making minor improvements, I feel it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! If I had to guess... (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)