Talk:Zong

Zong
76.66.195.159 (talk) 06:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 宗
 * 钟
 * 综
 * 總
 * 总
 * Tsung

Requested moves

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. walk  victor falktalk 11:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

– Zong was created as a disambiguated page, which was later moved to Zong - Disambuigation to avoid confusion with the newly created article on a cellular network ZONG. Zong - Disambiguation was moved back to Zong with Zong (disambiguation) as an additional redirect. Cellular Zong has been titled in capital letters as in logo for it was not possible at that time due to disambiguated Zong. Since Zong is a disambiguated article, it should be moved to Zong (disambiguation) and ZONG to Zong.  SAMI  talk 17:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)  SAMI  talk 17:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Zong → Zong (disambiguation)
 * ZONG → Zong
 * What evidence is there that the article currently at ZONG is the primary topic? older ≠ wiser 17:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * ZONG is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles.  SAMI  talk 17:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * That is your claim. What is the evidence for this claim? older ≠ wiser 18:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Here is an evidence where the editor linked it to Zong.  SAMI  talk 10:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose Zong (ship) aka Zong massacre is the nearest candidate to a primary topic in Google Books if there were one (there isn't). China Mobile's Pakistan JV is not even in the running. Although agree ZONG should not be capitalized, needs to move to Zong (telecommunications). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow close – nom is confused, thinking that "Since Zong is a disambiguated article, it should be moved to Zong (disambiguation)". This is nonsense.  The correct fix is to move ZONG to a sensible title; so I moved it to Zong (mobile network operator).  Dicklyon (talk) 01:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * oppose no indication of primary topic for the telecom business. -- 65.94.171.206 (talk) 04:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. "Zong" should be or redirect to the disambiguation page. Coreyemotela (talk) 10:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC).
 * Support. I'm supporting as a nominator. There is not even a single article merely Zong listed in the disambiguated Zong page and it should make a way for ZONG be moved to Zong.  SAMI  talk 16:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Support. Both ZONG and Zong should be redirected to Zong (disambiguation) UBS  talk  03:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Support. I think the page title should be redirected to Zong (disambiguation), so a person easily gain access to the desired article, rather if it is Zong (Mobile Company) or other Zong related topics. Fushantalk


 * Support. Both should be redirected to Zong (disambiguation). Fai  zan  13:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Zong mobile payments (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Zong mobile payments (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

"Zong (Pakistani mobile operator) (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Zong (Pakistani mobile operator) (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)