Talk:Zoo.gr

Rules in zoo.gr vs zoo coins
it is noticed that many times the rules of the site do not apply. the administrators ignore complains and dont even answer repeated mails. the site and its structure favors old users who are good customers in great disadvantage of newcomers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.27.59 (talk) 13:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Whether editors are 'old' or not, they still have to comply with the rules. The external links guideline clearly shows that if the official site is there, subdomains or secondary official sites are not necessary.  Moreover, wikis, whether official (per the previous) or not (obviously) should not be there and hence are removed.  Moreover, if your link-addition is challenged, it is to you to show that the link is necessary first before attempting to re-insert it.  You could do so already at a bot-revert, you certainly should when another editor removes your edit.  And then .. you are edit warring to keep a link in.  So you see that the rules of this sites DO apply - discussion is one of them.
 * So can you, when your block expires, please explain first? Thank you.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 15:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Zoo.gr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090303150534/http://www.dorabak.gr:80/ to http://www.DoraBak.gr

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)