Talk:Zotiel (angel)

Re: tagging for proposed deletion
I don't think this article meets the criteria for deletion because the angel has been mentioned in literature, particularly in both primary and secondary sources albeit not as many as the other angels. It wasn't constructed to vandalize or disparage anything. How many sources (or "secondary analyses" as the nominator mentioned) would I need to add or cite? Can you be more specific in your suggestions instead of being too broad? Pcbyed (talk) 21:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * What I meant was that there was no clear indication of notability- significant secondary coverage. One mention in one religious text doesn't bode well for notability. I still believe this topic is unnotable, and will nominate it for deletion, so that other editors can weigh in. Consensus will decide. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 14:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok This is noted. I removed the tag a while ago to contest the nomination. I would welcome alternatives, such as inclusion of the discussions here under some other article where you and other people may find better or more useful. I have also commented under the talk page of the deletion nomination of this article. Pcbyed (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)