Talk:Zubat, Golbat, and Crobat

Point of this article?
I'm typically an inclusionist, and I don't really see the problem with having pages on each Pokemon, but with Wikipedia's current standards, it is stupid that these three have their own article. They're not any more notable than say, Snivy. Shrug-shrug (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * First off, notability is determined by coverage in third party reliable sources. The huge reception section of this article shows that. Second, I would say that Zubat is much more popular then Snivy, if popularity is your sense of notability. Blake (Talk·Edits) 02:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)