Talk:Zubir Said/Archive: GA review

Successful Good Article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Pass
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Pass
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
 * 5. Article stability?
 * 6. Images?: Pass

Overall, a well written article. The only suggestion that I have is to clean up the NPOV just a little bit. It might just be me, but some parts just came off as opinionated, mainly in the introduction. Well done! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Ejg930 05:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for taking the time to review the article and to approve it for GA status. However, having re-read the introductory paragraphs, I don't think they are POV. The second paragraph is rather laudatory, but then I added "It has been said..." to make it clear that these were the opinions of some commentators. References are provided to these opinions in the body of the article. &mdash; Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 03:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)