Talk:Zvonimir Pospišil

Logic problem
The article currently says that he was one of the assassins - but, only one guy shot. So how, by simple logic alone, can he be one of the assassins then? I think it should be reworded. He was part of those who planned the assassination, but as far as I am aware, he was not directly involved in the shooting. Only the shooter on that day was directly involved. But the article sort of implis that Zvonimir was an "assassin", which, to me, means part of a hit-team that is directly involved in the actual attack as such. We normally don't call all people who help plan or organize an assassination ALSO assassins as such - the word just seems incorrect here in the context.

I refer to this part currently in 2021: "Pospišil is also known as one of assassins of Alexander I of Yugoslavia." 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)