Talk:Zwaardvis-class submarine

Untitled
I believe I had read somewhere that the 2 Zwaardvis class submarines in Lumut had been disposed off as scrap metal. I do not recall where did I read this though. Will be having some friends visiting the naval base this weekend to confirm it. [amlisk] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amlisk (talk • contribs) 17:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Zwaardvis-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130404073930/http://www.dutchsubmarines.com:80/classes/class_zwaardvis2.htm to http://www.dutchsubmarines.com/classes/class_zwaardvis2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Zwaardvis and Hai Lung classes not close enough
I think the Dutch Zwaardvis and Taiwanese Hai Lung classes should be removed from the Barbel-class template, with a separate template made for the Zwaardvis class, including the Hai Lungs, especially as they were all built in the Netherlands. A similar appearance and general arrangement does not amount to "the same" class. There is no indication from the articles that assistance of any kind was received from the United States in developing these submarines. Also, the Barbel-class' beam is 0.4 meters more than in the Dutch-built classes. RobDuch (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)