Talk:Zydus Lifesciences

Proclamation
New plant in Ethiopia in 2007 is launched by cadila pharmaceutical ltd. of Modi group and not by cadila health care, correction is required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.18.239.51 (talk) 06:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I want Zydus injection 4000
Sandeep 2405:204:1483:BC4F:AD8F:5FF8:CD69:36AE (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Production operator
4 yaar Experience in 132.154.53.221 (talk) 03:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Contaminated and adulterated Medicine.
See main article.

Possible malicious edits from 49.37.249.99 and 2405:201:D002:31A1:B989:1D96:DDEF:5644
EDIT Jun 27, 2024: It seems that after a few warnings, the user I complained about changed their IP to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2405:201:D002:31A1:B989:1D96:DDEF:5644 and started butchering this page again.

ORIGINAL POST: User: 49.37.249.99 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:49.37.249.99) has been consistently vandalizing this article (specifically the Controversies section of this Article) without reading the cited sources. They are interspersing their malicious edits between a bunch of minor and nonsensical edit and presenting the collection as legitimate edits.

This person's first edits in this Article with edit summaries like "rm BS unattributed claims..." completely butchered the Controversies section without even bothering to read the cited source. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&diff=1177914163&oldid=1177626250. This was not a constructive or factual edit, and it showed a lack of respect for other users.

I reverted their malicious edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&action=history) on September 30, 2023, and advised them not to engage in such behavior on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, they have now returned and are doing it all over again.

I wrote this up with details and posted it in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

In case that page is not there when you read this, I've provided a partial list of malicious edits to this article.

All of this is time-consuming; it took me a few days to compile this. It turns out that Brandolini's law is true. This person has never taken the time to research and write an article (new content); they haven't written anything longer than a few words (Their Toxic cough syrup edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_cough_syrup&diff=1178044776&oldid=1177727585 was the longest. It was messed up and had to be redone, and I'm unsure whether it belongs in that page because it's not about syrup containing toxic ingredients); From their edits in Zydus Lifesciences and Toxic Cough Syrup, it's obvious that they haven't even bothered to read the cited articles before making their edits. Their contributions are limited to minor edits, where they have consistently removed well-sourced content and replaced it with nonsensical information. I have provided five examples of malicious edits to this article below:

1. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&diff=prev&oldid=1177626250). They butchered the entire edit with a nasty comment. I undid this edit and warned them.

2. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&diff=prev&oldid=1178272575) They deleted something that is explicitly stated in the cited source. The source says, Cadila responded saying they had not seen similar adverse events elsewhere—an incorrect statement.

3. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&diff=prev&oldid=1178272151). An Ahmedabad doctor stated that "in the confusion of the pandemic, it was hard to attribute the death to either underlying covid co-morbidities or to the medicine". Their edit is not a replacement for the death toll of the contaminated Remdesivir, which they deleted with a nonsense edit summary. It is explicitly stated in the article that the death toll of Zydus' conaminated Remdesivir is an underestimate because of the lack of follow-up data from those who received the tainted medicine during the chaotic period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

4. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&diff=prev&oldid=1178273531). They removed an award for Cadila Pharmaceuticals as non-notable. The award has a Wikipedia Page: Welcome Trust. A simple Google provides multiple sources for the award, like this one: https://www.apnnews.com/cadila-pharmaceuticals-secures-wellcome-trust-award/.

5. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zydus_Lifesciences&diff=prev&oldid=1178273876). You can figure out that they made a bad edit here, and their edit summary is nonsense.

Their other edits on this page are similarly questionable, as they seem to disregard well-established and verifiable information.