Template:Academic-written review/doc

Usage
This template is based off the Academic Peer Reviewed template and is meant for Wikipedia articles updated as part of a dual publication model used by journals to incentivize scholarly contributions to Wikipedia. Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the Wikipedia version to the community at large.

Example with QID
Produces:

Example without QID
Produces:

Caveats
Note that this template transcludes the Cite Journal Template, and inherits one of the weaknesses/issues of said template. The author list must be formatted in a certain way or it will give errors when using the  parameter. If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the  instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a citation's metadata, and users consuming cs1|2 citations via the metadata will find that the citation is missing authors.

Categories for pages using these templates

 * Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
 * Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding articles published in