Template:Did you know nominations/1919 English cricket season

1919 English cricket season

 * ... that though there was no Test cricket played during the 1919 English cricket season, an Australian Imperial Forces cricket team toured England?
 * Reviewed: Gerald V. (Vic) Hurley

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self nominated at 15:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC).




 * Symbol possible vote.svg Hook is not cited in the article. Other than that, it's good. Trout me, and then just trout me, till I can get my troutifaction! (talk) 10:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hook fact still isn't sourced. --Orlady (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, I'm trying to see if there is a direct reference for this.  Harrias  talk 09:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg No source for the hook, more than three weeks since DYK proposal. Suggest to nominator that in future proposals a citation is found before writing the article. Nothing more to add here. C 679 19:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It's odd; there are lots of indirect ways of referencing that hook, just nothing direct at all, which is annoying. Never mind. Try this hook instead:


 * ALT1 ... that in the 1919 English cricket season, two-day County Championship matches were played, but they were not popular?  Harrias  talk 06:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * "The hook fact(s) must be stated in the article, and must be immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source." This is still not the case with the ALT1 hook. C 679 07:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Duplicated ref at the end of that sentence.  Harrias  talk 16:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg well in that case it's good to go. C 679 21:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That approval is for ALT1. For clarity, I struck the original hook. --Orlady (talk) 00:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)