Template:Did you know nominations/1921 Michigan Wolverines football team


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

1921 Michigan Wolverines football team

 * ... that 1921 Michigan Wolverines football team (pictured) outscored its opponents by a combined score of 187 to 21?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alex Bregman

5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The article was >5x expanded right before the nomination, is sourced and meets other guidelines. Spotcheck revealed no copyvios. The hook is interesting, short enough and is cited, but I notice that the inline source actually points to a combined score of 187-21. Is there another source that says 186? Once this is resolved and a QPQ is done, we should be okay. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging . EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Cbl62 has been busy, but not here. I did a courtesy user-talk-page ping a couple of days ago. If there isn't a response by June 15, a full week after the ping, I'll be marking this for closure; 40 days is more than enough time to supply a QPQ review, as is three weeks to resolve a sourcing issue. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. I believe I have now remedied the issues.  Cbl62 (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)


 * EricEnfermero, have the issues been remedied to your satisfaction? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Yes, we're good to go with the hook as revised. The article still meets the criteria from the first review (newness; 5x expansion; short, interesting hook; compliance with policies; no copyvios; sourcing). EricEnfermero (Talk) 08:25, 15 June 2015 (UTC)